Wednesday, April 30, 2003

Good luck on the marathon circuit guys! Glad to hear that you're all keeping in shape!

In other news, find myself hopelessly addicted to Sopranos. Currently in the throes of Season 2. Outstanding show, brilliant dark comedy. It's now holding strong as my all time favorite television show, having supplanted season 1 of ER.

Monday, April 28, 2003

Since we are on the topic of indian themed movies, have any of you heard of/seen Monsoon wedding? I think it debuted on video/DVD late last year. It's a decent flick, set in India in a family that is preparing for a festive wedding. The shots of the bustling are done well, and while the film is a bit cheeky in its plot, its worth seeing.

Saturday, April 26, 2003

There does seems a big influx of Indian themed movies these couple of years, along with equally, if not more, big wave of literary works from India or Indian diaspora. On the Borders Newly Arrived table you can always find one or two books written by Indian authors.

This reminded me, in Red Dragon, there was a FBI agent who appear to be Asian. I say appears because his last name is (I think) Bowman. Any guesses to what's his crime-solving specialty? Yep, crytopgraphy and handling computers.

Tuesday, April 22, 2003

Most influential AsianAmerican? I really can't think of any. But how would you define influence?

So who is #1 on the list? Let me guess, Amy Tan? shudder

Along with Tiger Woods...read Hsu's comments a few post ago. I think that list is a bit lacking as it doesn't mention the former Chancellor of UC Berkeley, Chang-Lin Tien (whose son Norman is a EE prof at Cornell). I don't think a semi-successful actor, #7 Jason Scott Lee (remember him as Liu-Kang from Mortal Kombat movies?) would compare.

Sunday, April 20, 2003

Greetings from beantown.

Saw BLT last night. An interesting film. I have to agree with Chris, it was a good thing that the film wasn't so much as being about Asian Americans as it just happened to have Asian actors. That's an important statement. Not all American movies with Chinese people in it need to be Joy Luck Clubs. As for the ending to the movie, Chris, did you read somewhere that there was a different, original ending? I did get the feeling that the ending was a little bit of a twist, but it seemed to make the movie work well. It felt like the more shocked/upset you were at the ending, the more engrossed you were in the movie up to that point.

On final note, Wally, will not be heading up to NYC this week, later this summer I hope.

Wednesday, April 16, 2003

Oh yes, by the way Andrew, I refuse to support UNC from now on. McCants is a bastard! That guy can kiss my A$$. I will not support UNC until Baddour is removed, or at least until all the current players from this current squad have left (except for Felton).

I'd just like to say that the fact that the smoking murder involved Asians doesn't in my mind make it any better or any worse. However, it is worth noting, that for better or for worse, many outside people's opinions about Asians are formed by events such as these, so it certainly isn't beneifical to our cause (if we even have such a thing).

The other thing I'd like to say is that while I also wouldn't mind seeing a movie about a bunch of engineers and biology Asian male students trying to pass exams at an Ivy League instiuttion while watching all the Asian female girls run off with white guys, I don't feel it is relevant to discuss Better Luck Tomorrow as some sort of stereotype breaking film. We should celebrate films for what they are, in this case a serious effort by a rising Asian American directorial star, that happens to focus on Asian Americans, something we can relate to, however distantly. Films like this should not be examined as political statements. True, some films are designed to make political statements, but some films are just about the film, and I fear sometimes we look too deeply for political/social signififance and miss the beuaty of the art at hand.

Tuesday, April 15, 2003

Perhaps those two just saw Better Luck Tomorrow and decide to contribute to the effort to break the non-confrontational Asian stereotype.

New York — A Manhattan nightclub bouncer was fatally stabbed when he tried to enforce the city’s new ban on smoking in bars and restaurants, police said Monday.
Police said they arrested two brothers, Johnathan Chan, 29 and Ching Chan, 31, shortly after the fight and charged them with assault, criminal possession of a weapon and resisting arrest.
Associated Press

Gotta love New York! Represent those Asians, way to go Ching!

Monday, April 14, 2003

Do you believe this commercial? Apparently, it's real (no tricks).

Hmm... With Better Luck Tomorrow, Spirited Away, and Cowboy Bebop, it looks like there's a mini Asian invasion at the theaters!

i am going this friday. the first day of summer!

Sunday, April 13, 2003

And I think the infoclearinghouse is run by one person who is using the cloak of "independent media source" (read first line of his "mission statement") to bash the US and only the US. Okay, so his focus is on US foreign policy. You know, there's much more to US foreign policy than just the Iraqi war. How about the billions of money given to third world countries? I've never heard those numbers on the network news because they're usually lost in some obscure Senate bill. Strange how he doesn't cover the positives, and only focuses on the negatives. If Fox News practices hypocrisy in their mission statement, this guy does even more so. But on the web, everyone's an author and a reader, even for the most disgrunted among of us.

We really can't compare infoclearinghouse and Fox News, they are apple and oranges. The former is a website run by one or two private individuals dissatisfied with the war cheerleading provided by major media outlets. So they collect news articles from various sources (mainly British media) that offer perspectives usually not found in the American mainstream media. This is not ignorance, this is a good service run by a few dedicated people. Fox News, on the otherhand, is a billion-dollar enterprise whose alleged mission is to provide impartial news to the huddled masses around the TV sets.

That Australian TV program clip provide four or five samples of Fox coverage that showcased its anchors and reporters' total lack of journalistic objectivity, for example, their sneering contempt for the Iraqis ("The Shi'ites have really hit the fan!"), their Beavis and Butthead style of blood-lustiness ("I really think they should use a bigger bomb, heh, heh heh") and their self-righteous arrogance ("You know why Al Jazzera show the prisoners and the dead? You know why? Because they're not on our side!")

Of course, these are just snippets of clips from a month long coverage, but a major news organization that tolerate these kinds of antics and attitudes is not worth my time. (by the way, ABC in the clip is Australian Broadcast Company, not the American one)

As for the GI-shitting-in-desert segment, it's just harmless fluff. But I think it's reflective of the sorry state of embedded TV journalism in general, not just Fox. They drive around the desert following the soldiers like camp-followers of a medieval army and periodically they stop, make sure their hair look properly windswept and squeeze off a two minute sound-bite that says everything and nothing. When there are truly nothing to report, well, there is always the shitting habits of GIs. Print-journalists are better I think: when they witness something, they have to think about it in order to write a thoughtful article. But nothing profound or interesting come from these two minute sound-bites. Their physical presence in Iraq add nothing to their reporting. They might as well be giving the report standing in front of a studio blue screen with the background footage of deserts and mosques digitally pasted in.

Also, I really don't see how watching GI shit in a desert is a human-interest story. Though it may have practical value: next time I am lost in a desert, I will make sure to bring a shovel. Thank you, Fox News.



All hail Mike Weir, first ever Canadian major champion! Down with the Tiger, the whitest person who still considers himself black in America. If Tiger played golf 200 years ago, he'd probably still support slavery as long as it kept paying his bills.

Support sexual discrimination, watch golf! It's nice of the sheriff of that county to designate a "first amendment" zone for the protestors about half a mile away from anyone else. Gotta love the power of the rich.

It turns out that I was able to view that video, but I had to use the download link instead of just watching it in the browser. First off, I always find it ridiculous that news broadcasts have started taking jabs at the competition. I find it distasteful when Fox News does it to CNN, and I find it distasteful now. Sounds like ABC has an identity problem to attack its rivals.

What the hell is wrong asking how the military goes to the bathroom when they're in the field? EVERYONE TAKES A PISS AND A DUMP, so I don't find why its so "offensive" to the ABC people for Fox to be reporting on it. Some people want to know how soldiers live, and what better opportunity than having the embeds do it? On top of that, I watched that live, and I remember that it was pretty late at night when they did that reporting, and as such, didn't really interfere with "real" reporting, which happens during the day. Reminds me of how Ashcroft got all up-tight with nude statues when ALL WOMEN HAVE BREASTS. I think it's more of a crime to show unnatural scenes such as the mutilated bodies of people rather than things that are more natural to human existence (sex included).

How does paying Al-Jazeera for their footage mean that the US broadcasts, Fox, NBC and CBS are bad in any sense? If anything, it shows that these US stations are willing to gather ALL the information and find what it wants to present to its audience. So what this buffoon on ABC is trying to say that you shouldn't criticize and pay an organization at the same time? WELL I'LL BE DAMNED! Looks like either I stop paying my taxes or shut up about Mr. Bushie!

Hogwash. He may have some points there, but my BS filter is already too full to process anymore.

That site has all the right to be ignorant and only see what it wants to see. I don't disagree with that aspect. However, I find it a bit absurd that it's trying to find fault with Fox News (one or two reports can't be representative of the entire organization as a whole, right?) when its own site is so polarized, or as they say "a pot calling the tea kettle black."

Saturday, April 12, 2003

I must disagree. informationclearinghouse is an anti-war website. The articles themeslves I find to be generally pretty good, offering perspectives not found in major news networks. The US government does come off in a bad light in them but one shouldn't condemn the website for that. To say infoclearinghouse is biased is to say a website for Democratic candidate is biased against Republicans. It has an legitimate opinion, so it's expressing it. Nothing wrong with that.

And on that site which used to host the Fox News comparison, these are the headlines (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/):

Iraq’s Liberation Front Attempts To Assassinate Chalabi
Read: US supports ILFA, ILFA wants to assasinate
Verdict: US BAD

Don't mess with Texas Lessons from the aggression against Iraq
Read: A mockery of Bush's Texan heritage.
Verdict: BUSH BAD

Stratfor Intelligence Report: The war in Iraq is not over: Iraq is a campaign in a much larger war and not a war in itself. We now will see what that means.
Read: US war will kill more Iraqis
Verdict: US BAD

Sowing the Seeds of Global Terrorism An in-depth look at the reality and consequence of the US invasion of Iraq.
Read: US will cause more terrorism from the war
Verdict: US BAD

Eye Witness Account Of The shooting Of Tom Hurndall By An Israeli Sniper Audio & Text.
Read: Those evil Israelis shoot innocent peace activist
Verdict: ISRAEL BAD (and as such, US BAD)

Iraqi Embassy Open for Business, Syrian Media Says Iraqis Will Strike Back at Coalition Forces.
Read: Iraqi still loyal and will fight those damn Yankees
Verdict: US BAD

Robert Fisk: Who is to blame for the collapse in morality that followed the 'liberation'?
Read: US caused chaos in the streets by toppling government
Verdict: US BAD

Media Watch: Human Beings As Feces On FOX NEWS A must see program from Australia's ABC
Read: Unknown (video not available, probably because these guys pirated the show without creator's permission)

More bloodlust than a real war By the time Baghdad fell, the supposed reasons for the invasion, like Osama bin Laden and Saddam himself, were still missing. Despite the best efforts of the Murdoch group's poisonous coverage, and numerous false alarms, no "weapons of mass destruction"
Read: All presumptions for war unfounded
Verdict: US BAD

"We haven't tasted Freedom yet"By all accounts, even the muted traces of celebrations that marked the arrival of the US troops barely days ago have vanished.
Read: Iraqi not free
Verdict: US FAILED (AND BAD)

Former congressman asks court to decide if Bush committed war crimes Callan argues that Bush is in violation of international law, including United Nations treaties and the findings of the Nuremburg Tribunal, for ordering the invasion of a country that has not attacked the United States.
Read: Bush is evil dictator
Verdict: BUSH BAD

Blix: US was bent on war: In a scathing attack on Britain and the US, Mr Blix accused them of "fabricating" evidence against Iraq to justify their campaign.
Read: US was trigger happy
Verdict: US BAD

Free to do bad things: War leaders are trying to damp down bad news coming out of post-invasion Iraq.
Read: US trying to suppress bad news
Verdict: US BAD

U.S. Threatens Iraqi Scientists
Read: US terrorizing innocent civilians
Verdict: Ibid

John Pilger: on a piratical war that brought terrorism and death to Iraq. Blair is a war criminal, and all those who have been, in one form or another, accessories should be reported to the International Criminal Court.
Read: Coaltion leaders are war criminals
Verdict: US BAD

Weapons teams scour Iraq
Read: Presumption of war was false
Verdict: US BAD

Battle near Syrian border designed to protect Israel
Read: US making lousy excuse for battle
Verdict: US BAD

Putin warns US on more attacks
Read: Mr. Russian Prez says US will be attacked
Verdict: US WILL SUFFER

Civilians, US tank crew killed in attempt to destroy arms
Read: Stupid Yankees killed themselves and poor civilians
Verdict: US MILITARY STUPID AND BAD

Children killed as driver fails to stop at checkpoint
Read: US kill kids
Verdict: US BAD

Robert Fisk: Flames engulf the symbols of power: You could count 16 columns of smoke rising over the city yesterday afternoon.
Read: Baghdad in chaos due to war
Verdict: US INCOMPETENT AND BAD

G.I. Who Pulled the Trigger Shares Anguish of 2 Deaths
Read: US Soldier kills his own
Verdict: US MILITARY INCOMPETENT

UK troops kill five robbers
Read: UK kills for petty larceny
Verdict: UK BAD

First U.S. Health Care Worker Stricken with SARS
Read: US not immune to Asian disease
Verdict: US DIE DIE DIE!

India Mulls 'Pre-Emptive' Strike, Cites U.S. Iraq War Precedent
Read: India thinks US did wrong thing
Verdict: US BAD

“Democracy in Iraq will take up to 30 years” The United States has neither the will nor the ability to bring democracy to Iraq, according to Middle East specialist Arnold Hottinger.
Read: Iraq will not be free
Verdict: US LIED AND BAD

Biased?

Iraq isn't likely to experience any democracy in the forseeable future. All hail President Chalabi! Just don't let him pay state visit to Jordan, where they will jail him for corruption.

Here is the video clip of a Australian TV program comparing Al Jazzera and Fox News. Pretty interesting.

In response to growing chaos in Iraq, U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said at the Pentagon. "It's untidy. And freedom's untidy. And free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things."

Friday, April 11, 2003

Show your patriotism!

This is absolutely hilarious. A must see!

Speaking of news biases, I was watching the news last week on NBC (as that is the only US channel I get) and saw yet another special on Jessica Lynch, the rescued soldier. Early on, when she was first rescued, I distinctly remember the news reporting that she had gone off to join the military in an attempt to raise money for college. However, in recent days, the word out of NBC is that what in fact happened was that she decided to go join the military because somewehat whimsically, she "wanted to see the world." Not only does this sound like a weak reason, but it leads me to think, is it wrong to even criticize the US's higher education system in times of war?

Thursday, April 10, 2003

Hmm, I've followed BBC for a while and they don't look very biased to me. All news sources agree anarchy is the rule in Baghdad. And it is somewhat expected the US troops don't want to and don't have the training to police a city. Anyway, 4 pictures from an article can't be representative of BBC as a whole.

On the frivolous side, you guys should take a look at the new Matrix: Reloaded trailer. In a word: Whoa.

BBC News is horribly biased. The captions from the 4 pictures in their headline article:

Gangs of armed looters make off with whatever they can carry.
Even Baghdad's hard-pressed hospitals have been targeted.
The US troops are only concerned with searching for weapons.
The UN is concerned about the need for aid in Iraq.

And they say Fox News is bad...

Wednesday, April 09, 2003

This is it, the most eagerly anticipated movie of the year goes into limited release next week. No, I'm not talking about the Matrix Reloaded, or X-2, or T-3, or any other retarded sequel that big budget hollywood has in store for us. No, I'm talking about Better Luck Tomorrow, by Justin Lin, the first major American movie ever about Asian males. And not only that, but it is said to be quite good, heaping up awards at Sundance and the Toronto International Film Festivals. Lets go represent!

Monday, April 07, 2003

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar might be the next head coach for the 2-25 (0-14 Ivy) Columbia basketball team next year.

Sunday, April 06, 2003

Don't be too sad, Chris. I've been to Borders countless times, results the same.

I just finished reading Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy. The best books I've read in two to three years, and I am not exaggerating. They are everything we wish books to be, and everything literature can hope to achieve. I've heard people describing it as a much darker "Harry Potter." I haven't read Harry Potter, but if the movies are any indication, than it has nothing on His Dark Materials. I am not going to recite the plot here, I will only say that the book begin in a parallel world, with a young, innocent girl playfully sneaking into a Oxford scholar conference room, and does something that triggers a series of adventures that will take her to the end of universes, to the land of dead and back, to the center of the mysteries of being human. I realize all these superlatives are not very meaningful, but if you take one recommendation from me this year, let it be to read His Dark Materials.

Sorry if I sound like zealot, but books and movies are about the only things I get evangelical about. In fact, I will mail the books to the first person who request them. I've come to the obvious conclusion that already read books don't serve much purpose except to sit on the book shelf to make the owner feel sophisticated. A great book unread is just a tragedy so it's better for these books to find new readers.

oh, one warning, if you're fiercely loyal to organized religion, this series is probably not for you.

p.s., in case you are wondering, I will use media mail and not going to charge you for it.

Saturday, April 05, 2003

In the immortal words of Goldberg:" Who's next?" After Iraq, that is. A scary article.

p.s. I am not an devotee of pro wrestling, learned that quote from Chris a long time ago.

In the first movie, we see things mostly from Starling's "sane" perspective, so it's fitting the tone of the movie is gritty and realistic. But the next movie the story is really Hannibal's. And instead of confined in a dungeon wearing jumpsuit, he is living the way he wanted. Here is a guy who scorned all social taboos, who listen to Goldberg Variations while beating a man to pulp and quotes Florentine history as he disembowel a victim, not to mention his dietary inclinations. He is an over-the-top, larger than life individual. So a story focused on Hannibal on the outside necessarily become over-the-top.

Friday, April 04, 2003

I haven't seen Manhunter either, though I've heard that it and Red Dragon are very, very similar. As far as Hannibal goes, my first thought is that it is way over the top. Personally, I think part of what makes Lecter so menacing and chilling is how real he could be, and that edge is lost in Hannibal which is almost like watching a comic book unfold, minus the tights. Secondly, yes, in the books, Thomas Harris goes to great lengths to explain Lecter's origin (another comic book story telling mechanism I imagine). Supposedly, he was sexually abused as a youth, on top of the wolves taking the sister. Iin reading this, it was rather disappointing as it goes a long way in demystifying Lecter, which is yet another reason I do not like the book/movie.

Hey, it's about Lecter, so I think its brazen outrageousness fit well with the demented world-view of Lecter. The first one felt too claustrophobic to me and I didn't particularly like Jody Foster's Starling.

Did you know Lecter originally came from Lithuania? At least that's according to the extra material on the DVD. Also it says when he was a little boy in the aftermath of WWII, his little sister was taken away by hungry townspeople and presumably eaten. Was this covered in the books?

Haven't seen Manhunter yet, wonder how it compares.

Tom, how can you like Hannibal the best of the 3 Lecter movies?!?!?!?! It is by far the worst of the 3!

Thursday, April 03, 2003

C'mon Wally, your life's not that boring. I'm sure you can fill up a blog. Looks like there's been a lot of action here since I've been immersed in my video game world. Have to catch up on everything...next week.

Wednesday, April 02, 2003

Surely you will provide us with a link to your xAnGa siTe, hOmiE?

Tuesday, April 01, 2003

I agree. I don't think the phatgirl page has much to do with race. Nor, for that matter, do I feel the Yankees ad have much to do with race, although I imagine that it is yet another example of it still being okay to make fun of Asians in the media. As for the act of putting out the ad, I also think it was bad taste on the Blue Jays to put out such an ad. However, since when were professional sports teams tactful? In fact, on the grand list of larcenies that pro sports teams perpetuate on a daily basis, this is surely just a minor detail. It is ridiculous that this ad (which I found humorous by the way as it also depicted bird shat on the beloved yankees cap) generates far more attention (on this blog, in the media, wherever) than say, the idea that pro sports owners can hold the fans for ransom and threaten to move their teams where-ever they want, an act that incidentally, for all you Yankee lovers out there, that the Bronx Bombers have tried repeatedly to do under Steinbrenner.